Q: How is this different from just subscribing to compliance software?

Software tracks what you tell it — it doesn't flag risk in a tool you just adopted, or tell you when a new regulation actually applies to your business. AI GaaS is judgment, applied continuously, not a dashboard. Many clients use both together.

Q: Can we pause or scale AI GaaS if our AI use changes significantly?

Yes — the engagement is reviewed and can be adjusted at each quarterly cycle as your AI footprint, team size, or regulatory exposure changes, rather than being locked into a fixed annual scope.

Q: Is AI GaaS the same as hiring a fractional or virtual Chief AI Officer (vCAIO)?

Functionally, yes — it fills the same role larger firms sell as a "fractional Chief AI Officer" or "vCAIO" retainer, often for $4,000–$15,000 a month. AI GaaS delivers that same continuous, senior-level AI governance leadership — quarterly reviews, regulatory monitoring, on-call decision support — scoped and priced for a small or mid-sized business rather than an enterprise retainer budget.

Q: Does AI GaaS keep us aligned with the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001 as they evolve?

Yes — that's the core of the quarterly regulatory scan. The EU AI Act's obligations continue phasing in, NIST AI RMF guidance is regularly updated, and ISO/IEC 42001 certification bodies refine what auditors expect. Rather than you tracking all three separately, AI GaaS monitors them together against your specific AI systems and flags what's actually changed for your business — not a generic compliance newsletter.

Question 1

Why "AI GaaS" instead of "RaaS" or "Risk-as-a-Service"?

Accepted Answer

Clarity. "RaaS" is also a well-known acronym for "Ransomware-as-a-Service" in cybersecurity &mdash; a completely unrelated, negative association nobody wants attached to their AI governance program. "AI GaaS" (AI Governance as a Service) says exactly what it is, with no confusion.

Question 2

How is this different from just subscribing to compliance software?

Accepted Answer

Software tracks what you tell it &mdash; it doesn't flag risk in a tool you just adopted, or tell you when a new regulation actually applies to your business. AI GaaS is judgment, applied continuously, not a dashboard. Many clients use both together.

Question 3

What's the typical response time for on-call support?

Accepted Answer

This is scoped explicitly at the start of the engagement so expectations are clear on both sides &mdash; AI GaaS is intentionally structured (quarterly reviews plus defined on-call support) rather than an unlimited, all-hours dependency, which keeps the relationship sustainable long-term.

Question 4

Can we pause or scale AI GaaS if our AI use changes significantly?

Accepted Answer

Yes &mdash; the engagement is reviewed and can be adjusted at each quarterly cycle as your AI footprint, team size, or regulatory exposure changes, rather than being locked into a fixed annual scope.

Question 5

Do you work with our existing legal or compliance team, or replace them?

Accepted Answer

AI GaaS is designed to work alongside existing legal, risk, or compliance functions &mdash; providing the AI-specific expertise most general compliance teams haven't built yet &mdash; rather than replacing broader legal or compliance functions.

Question 6

What happens if a new regulation creates an urgent gap outside the quarterly cycle?

Accepted Answer

That's exactly what the regulatory scan and on-call support are for &mdash; urgent regulatory changes are flagged and addressed as they happen, not held until the next scheduled review.

Question 7

Is AI GaaS the same as hiring a fractional or virtual Chief AI Officer (vCAIO)?

Accepted Answer

Functionally, yes &mdash; it fills the same role larger firms sell as a "fractional Chief AI Officer" or "vCAIO" retainer, often for $4,000&ndash;$15,000 a month. AI GaaS delivers that same continuous, senior-level AI governance leadership &mdash; quarterly reviews, regulatory monitoring, on-call decision support &mdash; scoped and priced for a small or mid-sized business rather than an enterprise retainer budget.

Question 8

Does AI GaaS keep us aligned with the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001 as they evolve?

Accepted Answer

Yes &mdash; that's the core of the quarterly regulatory scan. The EU AI Act's obligations continue phasing in, NIST AI RMF guidance is regularly updated, and ISO/IEC 42001 certification bodies refine what auditors expect. Rather than you tracking all three separately, AI GaaS monitors them together against your specific AI systems and flags what's actually changed for your business &mdash; not a generic compliance newsletter.

Správa AI jako služba – protože správa nekončí po spuštění, a my také ne.

Správa věcí veřejných, která tiše zastarává.

Opakující se čtvrtletní cyklus, nikoliv pojistka.

Čtvrtletní přehled

Regulační skenování

Podpora na telefonu

Údržba řetězu

Klíčové ukazatele výkonnosti (KPI), které skutečně mění chování.

% inventarizovaných systémů umělé inteligence

Míra incidentů s umělou inteligencí

% posouzených rizik před vydáním

% modelů pod aktivním monitorováním

Medián doby do schválení pro vysoce rizikové případy užití

Trendy výjimek z pravidel

Správná struktura pro vaše pódium.

Centralizované centrum excelence (CoE)

Federovaný Hub-and-Spoke

Vlastnictví produktové řady

Pro koho je AI Governance jako služba vytvořena.

SILNÉ PŘIDÁNÍ, POKUD

JEŠTĚ NE?

Nepřetržitý přístup, nikoli rotující tým.

Často kladené otázky

Přímý přístup. Žádní správci účtů, žádné fronty na tikety.